Issues : Rhythmic errors
b. 499
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||
b. 583
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) is probably erroneous – cf. analogous bar 232. In the main text, we preserve the nominal rhythmic values of the original version, whereas in GE3 the 1st note was prolonged to a crotchet, which may be considered an alternative reconstruction of the rhythm intended by Chopin. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||
b. 606
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the last note in the R.H. is a semiquaver, which is inconsistent with the demisemiquaver rest that precedes it. We correct this mistake in an obvious manner by shortening that note to a demisemiquaver. In GE and EE, the place was revised in the same way. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||
b. 608
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||
b. 667-670
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the middle notes of the tremolando that double the trill are devoid of extending dots. The inaccuracy was corrected in the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |