![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of JC
b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The c note in JC is most probably the copyist's error, which is revealed by d which is present both in EF and PE. In the two remaining similar phrases (bars 62-63 and 74-75), the chord on which the second bar is based differs significantly from the chord in the first bar; adopting the c note as the bass note would reduce the difference mainly to the omission of e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 71
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the highest note of the chord could be considered as the so-called Terzverschreibung if it was not for the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 72
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, lack of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 72-73
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 74
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The pitch and possible hold of the 2nd quaver of the bar raise doubts in the sources. Both in JC and in PE, when read literally, the note is a non-sustained d In the main text we give probably the only authentic version, written faultlessly in EF. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC , Errors in PE |