![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
According to us, an accidental omission of cresc. in FE (→GE,EE) is the most plausible explanation in this case. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The absence of pedalling marks in FE (→EE,GE1) is most probably an oversight of the engraver. The signs were added in GE2 (→GE3→GE4), probably on the basis of comparison with analogous places. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
In A (→GE1), FE and EE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In FE1 there is no top note of the chord, d
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
The inconspicuous little slur of A was overlooked both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). The absence in CGS – see b. 1-9. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |