![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of JC
b. 63
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 63
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
On the 4th quaver of the bar in JC, there is a figure which fills a crotchet with its rhythmic values: category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
a1 as the highest note of the chord is most probably an error of JC; it is revealed by f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Uncertain notes on ledger lines , Errors of JC , Errors in Fontana's editions |
||||||||||
b. 65
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Lack of d1 in JC is probably an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||||
b. 65-66
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, there is no octave sign over the part of the R.H. in those bars, as a result of which, the entire bar 65 and two triplets in bar 66 are written one octave lower. The awkward blends with the part of the L.H. (the second triplets of both bars) and the compatible version of EF and PE reveal the copyist's error in this place. Similarly in bars 101-102. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of JC |