Issues : FE revisions
b. 392-393
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
A comparison with b. 266-267 and analog. (7 places in total) points to Chopin's patent mistake. Therefore, in the main text we include the ties added in GE2 (→GE3). The tie of f was added already in FE (→EE), which is probably a revision of the engraver, who added the missing tie in the chord on the bottom stave as part of his routine activities (such routine additions are evidenced in the Mazurka in D Major, Op. 33 No. 3, b. 8-9 and 24-25). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of A , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 400
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In all editions except for GE2 the whole-bar rest was specified with the digit 1, one (FE and GE3) or both GE1 and EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 415-416
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Three clearly long accents written in A were reproduced in GE1, without any apparent reason, in an explicitly varied manner. However, FE restored the notation of A, which could be seen as Chopin's proofreading. Both in EE and GE2 the Chopinesque long accents were reproduced as common short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC and FE1 there is no lowering g2 to g2. This obvious mistake was corrected in GE and FE2. The accidental present in EE seems to be an editorial revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 507-508
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , FE revisions |