b. 26-28
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The longer slur of the editions most probably resulted from a mistake of the engraver of FE. It is noteworthy that in GE4 the range of the slur was not changed in accordance with A, despite the addition of a tie to d2 – see the preceding note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text we omit the superfluous (cautionary?) before a1, present in all sources. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 28-30
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The mark in b. 30 was added while proofreading FE (→GE,EE); there are no reasons to doubt the authenticity of this addition. In the main text we suggest adding an analogous mark in b. 28 as well (in a variant form, in brackets). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
We add a cautionary before g1 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
Chopin would sometimes use double slurs for pairs of L.H. octaves, e.g. in the Concerto in F minor, Op. 21, mov. III, b. 472-480. However, according to us, in the discussed place of the Ballade one can have doubts whether the top slur added by FE resulted from Chopin's proofreading or from a misunderstanding or a mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |