data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8754/d87542901ec59d50373e62fdeaa27658ebe3f57a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45570/45570130d3350cb196b62a10f420cd4f4b65d05c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37010/37010d435308e935082eee8514e9080629ef4a1b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4d9/bd4d9cd00d2c1945c34810fe11464c16c7fb995e" alt=""
The notation of accents on the LH chords is inconsistent in all the sources. In A the first few accents (in bars 164-166) are marked as short, the majority however (beginning with b.167) are unquestionably long ones and yet FC3 (→FE→IE) as well as GE and EE provide short accents only. In b. 169 of A there is no accent above the second chord, which was corrected in all other sources. A consistent musical context may result in an assumption that all those differences are but mere omissions, which leads to the version proposed for the main text. In FE (→IE) accents are marked in RH, which must have resulted from incorrect notation of FC3 (cf. notation of A, especially in bars 172-175).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Long accents
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins