Issues : Annotations in FES
|
b. 106-108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The 2nd note in FE (→GE) is a d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FES, there is a fingering digit ('1') written by the pupil's hand over the 7th semiquaver. It must be a mistake, since such a fingering is contrary to the digits written there by Chopin – see bars 106-108. Cf. the comment on bar 116. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The fingerings of three sources, although marked differently, are completely compliant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The digits written in FES in pencil are not only poorly visible, but they could have also been changed, as a result of which one can see more than one digit in some of the annotations. The markings over c category imprint: Differences between sources |
. Chopin corrected this patent mistake in 
