Slurs
b. 144-145
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Shifting the beginning of the slur to the last quaver in bar 144 is a revision of later GE, most probably in analogy to bars 16-17, in which the editions misinterpreted the notation of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 157-158
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
While writing this place in A for the second time, Chopin overlooked the slur over the part of the L.H. (cf. bars 29-30). According to us, it can be considered an inaccuracy, hence in the main text we suggest to complete the slur. A similar addition was performed in later GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 161-162
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The two-bar slur, written in A in bar 161 (written out) and 162 (empty), is most probably only a signal that in the marked bars 162-191 one has to include the slurring written in the first appearance of this section. Therefore, we limit its range to bar 161 and in bar 162 we repeat the slur from bar 34. This is how the Chopin notation was reproduced in the editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 167
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 182-183
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bars 54-55, combining the slurs in GE2no2 is a revision contrary to the Chopin notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |