Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 53-63
p. 1, b. 1-10
p. 2, b. 11-20
p. 3, b. 21-30
p. 4, b. 31-40
p. 5, b. 41-52
p. 6, b. 53-63
Main text
Main text
FC - Fontana's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FC - Fontana's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 62-63

No g1 in the last chord in FC (→GE) & FE

g1 in EE

The version of EE, with g1 in the last chord and tie sustaining d1, is most probably authentic, perhaps even the latest. It is indicated by lack of corrections in the notation of FC, which means that the same version – without g1 and tie – was in [A]. The version is to be seen in FE, which was most probably based on [A]. Therefore, if it was another copy of [A] that was base text for EE, the version with g1 and tie must have been written in this manuscript in the form of correction from the version of [A] and FC.
On the other hand, lack of a relevant correction, not difficult to perform from the technical point of view, in the proofread by Chopin FE suggests that the composer did not consider the version of EE to be a relevant improvement. The pupils' copies also do not include any changes. Taking into account both the above arguments and the undeniable authenticity of the compatible version of FE and FC, we adopt this version to the main text.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: GE1b, FED, FEJ, FES, FE1, FE2, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, FC, EE1, EE2, EE3