data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8754/d87542901ec59d50373e62fdeaa27658ebe3f57a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45570/45570130d3350cb196b62a10f420cd4f4b65d05c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37010/37010d435308e935082eee8514e9080629ef4a1b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4d9/bd4d9cd00d2c1945c34810fe11464c16c7fb995e" alt=""
Chopin doubled the bass in the bottom octave in the proofreading of FE2 (→EE).
In the majority of the later collective editions, the 1st octave in bar 103 was arbitrarily changed from F1−F
to G
1−G
. In order to consider this change to be accurate, Chopin would have had to:
-
commit a mistake in A, by writing a wrong note very clearly – the note head is placed at a significant distance from the stave, hence there is no doubt it is an F
;
- leave this mistake unnoticed, by adding a doubling of this note in octave in the proofreading of FE2.
This kind of coincidence seems to be totally unlikely, therefore the described change is only a proof of difficulties in accepting some of Chopin's unconventional harmonic turns.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information
issues: Authentic corrections of FE, Bass register changes
notation: Pitch