Slurs
|
b. 32-33
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
Cf. a note on the previous page category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 32-33
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In GE2 (→GE3) the R.H. slur was omitted, probably by mistake. It is also possible that the slur of GE1 was not taken into consideration on purpose, as the correction of its extent was intended, yet not completed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The phrase mark in A, just like two further ones in analogous situations, embraces the motif that consists of two thirds a flat1-c2. The meaning of that curved line in GE1 (→FE) is no longer clear, as it could just as well be interpreted as a tie sustaining as1. This is at least how the reviewer of GE2 understood it, which is evidenced by the change made in bars 34-35. In the discussed place in GE2 the slur was omitted, probably with the intention to move the slur of GE1 up in order to turn it more clearly into a tie (it reappeared in GE3). The engraver of EE read the line to be a tie sustaining a flat1 and engraved it in a manner that left no room for doubt. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 34-35
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The curved lines under the thirds a flat1-c2 in bars 34-35 and 43-44 are phrase marks in A, not ties for a flat1. This is less obvious in the notation of GE1, and even less so in FE and GE2 (→GE3). The notation of EE clearly suggests ties. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
|
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
We suggest supplementing the phrase mark after bars 43-44 and in line with authentic markings in bars with a similar rhythmic structure. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
