Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The long accent of A was reproduced in GE as a short one. The absence of any sign in FE (→EE1) is probably an accidental omission. The (short) accent was restored in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In our main text we give the unambiguous text of A. The inaccurate notation of GE1 (→FE) resulted in a clearly erroneous notation of EE. In GE2 (→GE3) the erroneous placement of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 29-31
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The slur in A, despite its reaching quite far to the left towards the 1st crotchet, definitely begins from embracing the chord on the 2nd crotchet. Still, in GE (→FE→EE) the slur begins on the 1st crotchet. The result of corrections halfway through bar 30 is not obvious at the first glance and GE1 (→FE→EE) do not end the slur at that point. A more detailed analysis of the notation reveals that Chopin divided the original slur, which was probably already noticed in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The long accent of A, not very big but having a characteristic shape, was reproduced as a short one in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
in 
