data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8754/d87542901ec59d50373e62fdeaa27658ebe3f57a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45570/45570130d3350cb196b62a10f420cd4f4b65d05c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37010/37010d435308e935082eee8514e9080629ef4a1b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4d9/bd4d9cd00d2c1945c34810fe11464c16c7fb995e" alt=""
In EE and GE2 (→GE3) the slur between bars 88 and 89 was broken. In the case of EE, it is hard to state whether it is an inaccuracy or a revision (one cannot even completely exclude Chopin's possible proofreading in the base text to EE). The version of GE2 (→GE3) is certainly a result of a revision. Due to the lack of proof for a later change of Chopin's concept, in the main text we abide by the slurring following from the notation of FE (→GE1), based on [A].
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions, EE inaccuracies
notation: Slurs