|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
According to us, the end of the slur in FE1 is printed inaccurately; the slur in bar 67, which is in the next line, suggests to continue the slur from the previous bar. However, both in FE2 and EE it was the scope of the slur in bar 66 that was assumed as the correct one. Moreover, in those editions the whole sign was moved under the notes, which is almost certainly contrary to the notation of [A1]. The slurs of GE present probably a slightly different version of this place in [A2]. The version of EE2 is a compilation of the notation of EE1 and GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The sources differ here in the notation of the 2nd half of the bar, which can reflect layout differences between the autographs. In the main text we give the notation of FE (→EE), in which the wave of quavers reaches smoothly the final written appoggiatura in bar 67. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the more precise notation of GE. Lack of a dot in FE (→EE1) may be a result of the engraver's inattention. In EE2 a dot was added on the basis of the version of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the sources there is a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
|
b. 67-74
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Placing the category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
before a. We also add a 
in 
