Issues : Authentic corrections of FC
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The slur and staccato dot were most probably added to FC by Chopin (together with the pedal marks in this bar), and we include them as such in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
Lack of pedalling in A (→FE) is one of the examples of an incomplete coordination of corrections and additions introduced by Chopin in three Stichvorlage manuscripts. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 26-28
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Same as in bar 24, in the main text we give long accents, written most probably by Chopin in FC. The missing first sign in bar 28 is certainly an oversight, corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
As in bar 18, in the main text we give the hairpin entered almost certainly by Chopin into FC. In GE the mark was clearly extended, which can interfere with the performance manner intended by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Authentic corrections of FC |