Issues : Inaccuracies in A

b. 367

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

pédale de la basse in AsI

 after first quaver in A, literal reading

 under 2nd quaver in GE (→FE,EE,FESB)

 under 1st quaver suggested by the editors

..

The placement of the  mark in A does not allow us to reproduce Chopin's intention unequivocally. Statistically speaking, Chopin would write a  mark more often – especially in the case of low-placed bass notes – before the note it was supposed to concern than after such note, but his autographs include both situations. Therefore, we assume that in this case it is the pianistic context that is decisive – bass pedal notes belong to Chopin's favourite harmonic procedures, hence the doubled F1-F octave held with pedal seems to be more likely than the solution adopted by the editions. This conclusion is confirmed by the notation of AsI – the 'bass pedal' indication written under the semiquaver figuration undoubtedly refers to the reverberation of the initial octave, which in the orchestral part is sustained by the f note, played in bars 367-368 by the bassoon, while in bars 369-370 by the French horn. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 409-419

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Slurs to c3-f3 in A (contextual interpretation) & GE2

Slurs to d3 in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

In A, the slurs over each of the descending figures in the R.H. in bars 409, 410, 417 and 418 reach the c3-ffourth at the beginning of the next bar (the first of them, slightly shorter, is an exception, yet in this case Chopin certainly had a longer slur in mind, too, which is proved by the slur of the original crossed out notation of bars 409-411). In spite of this, in GE1 (→FEEE) all four slurs end with the last quaver in these bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 413-421

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Wedge in bar 413 in A

Dot in bar 413 in GE

No marks in FE (→EE)

Wedges in bars 413 & 421 suggested by the editors

..

The wedge at the beginning of bar 413 was reproduced in GE as a dot. In FE (→EE) the sign was overlooked. No staccato mark in analogous bar 421 must be Chopin's oversight: it is the first bar on a new page of A, which was frequently related to various inaccuracies of notation.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges , Inaccuracies in A

b. 432-433

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

f2 tied in A, contextual interpretation

f2 repeated in GE (→FEEE)

..

In A, the tie sustaining fis written only in bar 433, opening a new page in A. It could have been a reason for its omission in GE (→FEEE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A

b. 435

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

 in A (→GEFE)

  in EE

Our variant suggestion

..

The pedalling of A (→GEFE) is questionable in this bar. Initially, both this and the next bar had a whole-bar pedalling. Chopin then crossed out both signs in bar 436 and a  in the discussed bar 435. It is difficult to guess what a sole  mark left in this bar could mean in this context, hence it seems that Chopin committed a mistake: he either forgot to cross out the  mark or he unnecessarily crossed out the  mark. According to us, the latter option seems to be more plausible; therefore, in the main text we give a completed pedalling, written in brackets to signalise that its status is not entirely certain. EE added a  in accordance with the harmonic sense. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in A