Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
|
b. 524-525
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The slur ending as soosn as b. 524 must result from the inaccuracy of GC, which, however, was not copied in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 530-539
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The above variants show both sources versions of pedalling of the bars (all of them incomplete or unclear) and their possible interpretations and supplementation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 530-533
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The LH crotchets are marked with staccato dots only in GC, at the same time b. 531 was overlooked, which in this context must be seen as omission. In GE there is no mark in b. 530. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 537
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC the slur ends over the rest on the second beat of the bar. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 548-549
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
One can doubt whether the break between the slurs visible in GC and copied even more vividly into GE actually reflects the true sense of [A1] notation, as neither EE nor FE displays this divided slur. The break in the slur at this point is related to the basic rhythmic structure (in b. 549 anouther four-bar section begins) but it is not compatible with the motif-based or phrase structure. Therefore, for the main text we adopt the EE and FE version. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
