Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
b. 337
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE, GC and FE1 there is no augmenting a2 to category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 344-347
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
 
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Inaccuracies in GC , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE, GC and FE there is no raising a2 to a2. The accidental was added in GE, which must have been done by the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 350
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC the middle note of the last chord is notated inaccurately - even though it looks more like d1 (and it was read accordingly in GE), but it cannot be ruled out that the copyist meant to notate e1 based on the following:
Therefore, in the main text we present e1. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 377-378
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Given the apparently inaccurate notation of sources we suggest a slur based on a corresponding phrasing in bars 117-118. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |