



Issues : Terzverschreibung error
b. 233
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The logic of the figuration's structure and a comparison with analogous bar 235 point to a Terzverschreibung error of FE. The conclusion finds confirmation in a correction of this note performed in pencil – perhaps with Chopin's hand – in FES. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES |
|||||
b. 236
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GC (→GE1) is certainly erroneous – the double stroke of the same note (a1) by the L.H., unjustified by the voice leading, does not make any sense, as far as the piano technique is concerned. It is worth observing that the copyist initially wrote a chord within the correct, one octave, span, yet with a double Terzverschreibung error – a-c1-e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Errors of GC , Alterations in GC |
|||||
b. 238
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 there is an f-a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 243
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
FE1 has an erroneous c2 instead of an e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 245
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The version of FE, with an added category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error |