Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-35
p. 3, b. 36-51
p. 4, b. 52-67
p. 5, b. 68-85
p. 6, b. 86-103
FEF - French edition by Fontana
Main text
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
JC - Jędrzejewicz Copy
PE - First Polish Edition
EF - Editions by Fontana
FEF - French edition by Fontana
GEF - German edition by Fontana
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FEF - French edition by Fontana


  b. 1

No marking in JC

 in EF

 in PE

Our suggestion

The dynamic marking in PE looks like . However, it seems very likely that in [A] there was  in this place, which is indicated by:
— the shape of the sign, differing from other  featured in PE; its lower part matches the shape of ;
— different performance markings of the introduction, particularly the accents in bars 1-3 and marcato in bar 4;
— the introduction's character, texture, register, and key;
— the sign's position on the stem of the 1st chord in the R.H., which could have impeded its correct reading.
In EF a dynamic marking –  – appears only before the 2nd beat of the bar.
 

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Verbal indications