Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 59-63
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3, b. 1-38
p. 4, b. 39-58
p. 5, b. 59-63
p. 6, b. 64-103
p. 7, b. 104-135
p. 8, b. 136-153
p. 9, b. 154-175
p. 10, b. 176-190
p. 11, b. 191-207
p. 12, b. 208-230
p. 13, b. 231-239
p. 14, b. 240-254
p. 15, b. 255-267
p. 16, b. 268-288
p. 17, b. 289-306
p. 18, b. 307-323
p. 19, b. 324-341
p. 20, b. 342-357
p. 21, b. 358-373
p. 22, b. 374-382
p. 23
p. 24
A - Autograph fair copy
Main text
AsI - Working autograph of score
A - Autograph fair copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE3 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FESB - Later French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AsI - Working autograph of score
A - Autograph fair copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE3 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FESB - Later French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF A - Autograph fair copy


  b. 63

No mark in AsI & A

Long accent in GE (→FE)

Short accent in EE & FESB

The long accent added by GE1 could be considered a revision or even Chopin's intervention were it not for the  marking situated in the same place. The chord provided with this dynamic indication ends a long diminuendo (running from the beginning of this extended bar); therefore, emphasising it would be contrary to Chopin's clear idea, which was to attenuate the music. We assume a possible "symmetrical reflection" mistake – the accent that was supposed to be placed under the stem of the e1 crotchet after the minim chord was printed over the stem of the F-c fifth preceding that chord. Taking into account the above, we do not give this accent in the main text.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, Inaccuracies in FE, Errors in GE, GE revisions, EE inaccuracies, Authentic corrections of GE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: AsI, A, GE1, GE2, GE3, FESB, FE2, EE1, EE2, EE3, FE1