Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 1-32
p. 1
p. 2, b. 1-32
p. 3, b. 33-54
p. 4, b. 55-69
p. 5, b. 70-84
p. 6, b. 85-98
p. 7, b. 99-117
p. 8, b. 118-140
p. 9, b. 141-161
p. 10, b. 162-182
p. 11, b. 183-198
p. 12, b. 199-213
p. 13, b. 214-226
p. 14, b. 227-236
p. 15, b. 237-246
p. 16, b. 247-261
p. 17, b. 262-279
p. 18
EE2 - Changed impression of EE1
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Changed impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Changed impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF EE2 - Changed impression of EE1


  b. 23

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

Staccato dot suggested by the editors

The missing dot is almost certainly an oversight – the mark is present in analogous b. 167, which in [A] was probably marked as a repetition of the discussed bar.  

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues:

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: EE2, EE1, FE1, FED, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3