![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 16, b. 466-495
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
The missing accent does not have to be considered an oversight in this case – cf. the twin phrases of this three-part progression (bars 473 and 477). Therefore, in the main text we suggest a long accent in accordance with the interpretation adopted in the mentioned bars. An accent (short) was added in GE3.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Long accents, GE revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, GE2a, FEFo