Page: 
Source: 
p. 8, b. 194-221
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-58
p. 3, b. 59-89
p. 4, b. 90-122
p. 5, b. 123-144
p. 6, b. 145-162
p. 7, b. 163-193
p. 8, b. 194-221
p. 9, b. 222-239
p. 10, b. 240-260
p. 11, b. 261-279
p. 12, b. 280-315
p. 13, b. 316-342
p. 14, b. 343-360
p. 15, b. 361-375
p. 16, b. 376-391
p. 17, b. 392-409
p. 18, b. 410-449
p. 19, b. 450-475
p. 20, b. 476-495
p. 21, b. 496-520
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1


  b. 199-200

Slur in FE (→EE)

No slurs in GE1 (→GE2)

Slur in GE3

2 slurs suggested by the editors

The five-quaver slur in bars 199-200 was probably added in the last phase of proofreading of FE, which is indicated by its absence in GE. Leaving the 2nd quaver in bar 200 without slur may suggest different possibilities of phrasing and articulation. However, it is most probably an inaccuracy of notation, since in similar motifs the note, in the vast majority of situations – both in FEpiano and in the sources of the orchestral part – is connected to the previous one with a slur. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest adding a respective slur (in GE3, it was added as the only slur in this place). There is a similar situation in bar 444. 

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, GE2a, FEFo