![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 9, b. 261-289
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
Both source versions of the 4th quaver may be authentic, yet each of them may be erroneous:
-
the version of FE and GE with single a
1 may be a result of an error of the engraver of FE, noticed by Chopin only at the time of preparing the base text to EE;
-
the version of EE with the a
1-c2 third may be a mistake of the engraver (the thirds on the 4th quaver of the bar are present both in the previous bars and in the next one, cf. bar 284) or a revision on the basis of the analogy with the next bar.
According to us, there are a few more arguments for a single note in this place, yet they are not conclusive. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution.
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, Authentic corrections of EE
notation: Pitch
Missing markers on sources:
FE0, FE1, FED, FEJ, FEG, GE1, GE2