![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
In all sources the number of mazurkas in the opus is expressed in full word – Quatre Mazurkas, yet in the main text we provide a digit, understandable regardless of the language. What is more, it cannot be excluded that in the autograph (lost) Chopin wrote a digit, as he did in the preserved autographs of opuses 24 and 50, which the French publisher did not respect in opus 24, replacing the digit with a word. In FC the title contains a mistake – Quatre Mazurka. The title having been expanded in EE was an arbitrary decision of the publisher – all opuses of Chopinesque Mazurkas were named like that. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts |
||||||||
b. 28-30
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
Chopin added the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The naturals to the L.H. octave on the 2nd beat of the bar are missing in FC – the visible pencilled naturals were added by the reviser of GE1. It is difficult to say whether it is an oversight by Fontana or by Chopin in [A]. All editions contain the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts , Errors of FC |