![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of FC
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
In all sources the number of mazurkas in the opus is expressed in full word – Quatre Mazurkas, yet in the main text we provide a digit, understandable regardless of the language. What is more, it cannot be excluded that in the autograph (lost) Chopin wrote a digit, as he did in the preserved autographs of opuses 24 and 50, which the French publisher did not respect in opus 24, replacing the digit with a word. In FC the title contains a mistake – Quatre Mazurka. The title having been expanded in EE was an arbitrary decision of the publisher – all opuses of Chopinesque Mazurkas were named like that. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The missing e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The easiest explanation for the absence of pedal marks in this bar in FC is the copyist's oversight. However, it is likely that it was Chopin himself that overlooked them in [A] and added them there after FC had already been finished. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The sources do not include a category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors of FC , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
In FC (→GE) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC , Errors repeated in GE |