Page: 
Source: 
p. 17, b. 208-227
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-29
p. 3, b. 30-44
p. 4, b. 45-54
p. 5, b. 55-61
p. 6, b. 62-63
p. 7, b. 64-87
p. 8, b. 88-109
p. 9, b. 110-122
p. 10, b. 123-139
p. 11, b. 140-147
p. 12, b. 148-155
p. 13, b. 156-163
p. 14, b. 164-180
p. 15, b. 181-191
p. 16, b. 192-207
p. 17, b. 208-227
p. 18, b. 228-254
p. 19, b. 255-265
p. 20, b. 266-274
p. 21, b. 275-293
p. 22, b. 294-304
p. 23, b. 305-316
p. 24, b. 317-326
p. 25, b. 327-336
p. 26, b. 337-348
p. 27, b. 349-360
p. 28, b. 361-370
p. 29, b. 371-382
Main text
Main text
AsI - Working autograph of score
A - Autograph fair copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE3 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FESB - Later French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AsI - Working autograph of score
A - Autograph fair copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE3 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FESB - Later French edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 208

No fingering in A (→GE1FE,EE)

Fingering in GE2 (→GE3,FESB)

The authenticity of the fingering of GE2 cannot be entirely ruled out; however, a few combinations contrary to the Chopinesque fingering confirmed by other pieces are an argument against this possibility (see bars 55-58). In the case of the digits added in this variation, it is not the digits themselves but the selection of notes that are provided with them that could be questioned – the use of the 1-2 fingering combination on all dyads is as obvious as the use of the 5th finger on the even, top semiquavers, hence it is surprising that they were treated differently. The same objection could be raised in the second place in which the fingering was added – in bar 230

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

notation: Fingering

Missing markers on sources: AsI, A, GE1, GE2, GE3, FESB, FE2, EE1, EE2, EE3, FE1