Issues : Omissions to cancel alteration
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the sources, there is no restoring d1 on the 4th beat of the bar. The mistake resulted from the way the piano reduction was prepared – the R.H. top voice corresponds to the Violin II part, in which there is no need for a , since it does not feature a d1. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A |
||||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The restoring b1 in the 2nd half of the bar is absent in all sources. It must be Chopin's mistake, one of his most frequent errors. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Even though none of the sources features an accidental to the top note of the last semiquaver, the use of g3 is much more likely, considering the melodic and harmonic context. Overlooked accidentals in such situations are one of Chopin's most frequent mistakes, cf., e.g. the Etude in F minor, Op. 25 No. 2, b. 4 or the Impromtu in A, Op. 29, b. 3 and 71. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A |
||||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Revisions in FESB |
||||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The authentic chromatic notation of the descending part of the roulade takes into account the validity of the previously entered accidentals only to a minimal extent:
This notation was repeated without any changes by the majority of the editions. Only in FESB a restoring c4 was added (14th note). The choice between the orthography of the sources (complemented) and the one proposed by us is made possible in the note presenting the earlier version of the R.H. figuration recorded in #ApI. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Revisions in FESB |