Verbal indications
|
b. 45-54
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information |
|||||||||||
|
b. 55-61
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information |
|||||||||||
|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text, we keep the extended performance indication as provided in A (→GE→FESB). In the remaining editions, the Chopinesque leggier. abbreviation, not entirely clear, was replaced with leggiero, the meaning of which (but not the form) most probably corresponds to the indication intended by Chopin – see the note to b. 14. At the same time, in EE there are more abbreviations, while in FE1 (→FE2) the word 'ma' was omitted; those changes almost certainly resulted from revision or the engraver's inaccuracies. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we explain the Chopinesque prestiss. abbreviation, since Chopin probably wanted to fit it between the staves (it can be seen that he started reducing the letter size while writing). Actually, such a solution was already introduced by GE (→FE,EE,FESB). category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
