![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 327-328
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in previous analogous sequences, Chopin did not see the reason to write accidentals to the topmost notes of the ascending triplets. In GE1 (→FE,EE) only 2 sharps in bar 328 were added, c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 329-330
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in many similar situations, in A the majority of the necessary accidentals are missing – Chopin wrote accidentals only to the 2nd quaver in bar 329 (e2-e3-g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 331
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI and A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Enharmonic corrections |
|||||
b. 335
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in the entire Variations, while writing A Chopin treated accidentals almost like key signature accidentals – he considered them to be valid in all octaves on a given stave and in a given clef. Therefore, in the R.H. part the last entered accidental is a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 335
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |