Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 323
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The version of the majority of the editions must be a consequence of a mistake by the engraver of GE1, who omitted here staccato marks as well. The missing semiquaver beams were added in GE3. A similar situation is to be found in bar 329. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 323
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The fingering added in GE2 (→GE3,FESB), natural in this place, most probably, however, does not come from Chopin – see bars 55-56. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 324-325
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in bars 321-322, Chopin did not write in A accidentals to the last semiquaver of each beat of these bars. All necessary accidentals were already added in GE (→FE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 327
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In GE1 (→FE1,EE1→EE2) there are no accidentals to the fifth on the 2nd quaver in the bar, which would result in B category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
|
b. 327-329
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As before, all staccato marks used by Chopin, in this case dots, were arbitrarily reproduced in GE as wedges. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Wedges |
3 & b
