Issues : Errors repeated in EE
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Revisions in FESB |
||||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The authentic chromatic notation of the descending part of the roulade takes into account the validity of the previously entered accidentals only to a minimal extent:
This notation was repeated without any changes by the majority of the editions. Only in FESB a restoring c4 was added (14th note). The choice between the orthography of the sources (complemented) and the one proposed by us is made possible in the note presenting the earlier version of the R.H. figuration recorded in #ApI. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Revisions in FESB |
||||||
b. 59-61
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Rhythmic errors , Main-line changes , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Chopin erroneously wrote the syncopated c2 note on the 2nd quaver in the bar as a double dotted crotchet. The mistake was only noticed by FESB, which tried to amend it by replacing the dots with a semiquaver, connected to the crotchet by a tie (in this place there is actually no tie, but this must have been the reviser's intention, which is proven by the ties in analogous situations in b. 77 and 89). Rhythmically speaking, the notation is correct; however, it is unclear due to the arrangement of the notes – the added semiquaver was placed not over the last quaver in the bottom voice, but right next to the crotchet. In the main text we suggest the same rhythmic values yet correctly arranged and beamed. Chopin used a similar notation in the Prelude in C minor, Op. 45, b. 7, 11 and analog. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |