b. 309
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The to the bottom note of the octave on the 3rd beat of the bar, overlooked in the manuscripts, was added right away in GE1 and repeated in the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 310
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The wedges in the editions resulted from the engraver of GE1 having misinterpreted the authentic dots. In GE3 wedges were arbitrarily added over the chords too (cf. bar 305). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||||
b. 310
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The differences in the range of the hairpin resulted from routine revisions, adjusting the marks to rhythmic structures or beams – in GE1 (→GE2,EE,FE) on the left-hand side, while in FESB also on the right-hand side. The absence of the mark in GE3 is an oversight by the engraver. In the main text we reproduce the mark of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 311
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The wedges, added to the bass crotchets in GE1 certainly by mistake, were strangely consistently repeated by all the remaining editions. The source of the mistake could be the first crotchet stem, to f, which in A does not reach the notehead and therefore could have been considered a wedge. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 311
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
We add a cautionary before f2 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |