![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In FE there is no category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In GE and EEW the absence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
|||||||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The version of GE1 (→GE2) with a pianistically awkward and sonically unjustified cluster of g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
If we were to take into account the pedalling of the entire Mazurka, the absence of category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |