Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-28
p. 1, b. 1-28
p. 2, b. 29-56
Main text
Main text
As - Autograph sketch
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EEW - First English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
As - Autograph sketch
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EEW - First English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 25

Longer slur in FE (→GE1,EEW)

Shorter slur in GE2 (→GE3)

The shorter slur in GE2 (→GE3) could have resulted from a misinterpretation of the GE1 slur – it could have been regarded as an inaccurate slur under the quaver group. Not only does the slur indicate legato articulation, but it also separates the entire 5-note tenor voice motif, whose range is unobvious in the simplified Chopinesque notation.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FE2, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, EEW, As