Issues : GE revisions
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The separated hairpin in GE is a revision facilitating the engraver's work. In Chopin's times, both versions of notation were often considered equivalent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
|||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
We add a cautionary before g in the main text. The accidental was also added in GE. Similarly in bar 48. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 9-14
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The non-slashed grace notes in bars 9 and 14 is a systematic inaccuracy of the engraver of GE – all grace notes in the entire opus 63 are non-slashed in GE. As confirms the authenticity of short, slashed grace notes of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
Taking into account the fact that a double bar line is already in As, the version of GE is probably an arbitrary revision or a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 19-27
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary to d1 in bars 19 and 27, which was performed also by GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |