Issues : GE revisions
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
The c1-d1 second in FE1 (→GE1→GE2) must be a mistake (most probably by the engraver), which is proven by b-c1:
The correct text of GE3 most probably resulted from the fact that a copy of FE2 was used in the revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
|||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
As in bar 5, the having been placed under b resulted from a routine revision of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2). The misleading notation was corrected only just in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||
b. 7-15
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
In bars 7 and 15 the sources do not contain sharps over the mordents. There are no doubts as to the sound of the top note, while the notation is inaccurate, as usual in such situations in Chopin's works (in bar 7 it concerns only AI and GE3 due to the misplaced mark in the remaining sources). In the versions 'edited text' and in the main text we add the absent accidentals. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
We add a cautionary before e1 in the main text. The accidental was also added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
The cautionary accidentals before the first notes on both staves, a to E and a to d2, are present in all sources except GE1. Formally speaking, they are not necessary; however, in this context their absence must be considered a mistake. Both were added in GE2 (→GE3), along with a third one, a to e2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |