Rhythm
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
The missing tie to f in FE is almost certainly an oversight (by the engraver or by Chopin in [A]). In EEW a revision was performed, probably on the basis of a comparison with bars 57-60 and 61-64, in which both g and c1 are sustained for 4 bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 59-60
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
The version of GE is an arbitrary revision, probably resulting from an analysis of bars 53-64 in FE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 61-64
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
The missing ties to c1 in FE1 are most probably an oversight by the engraver, corrected in FE2 (→EE). The version of GE1 (→GE2) is probably a revision resulting from an analysis of the ties to the top L.H. notes in bars 53-64, which we discuss in more details in the note to bar 55. In GE3 a third tie was added, perhaps under the influence of FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
The version of AI with an f minim was replaced by Chopin in [A] by the version of FE (→GE,EE) with a dotted rhythm. However, in FE1, as in bars 58-60, Chopin almost certainly forgot about the raising d to d in the last quaver, as a result of which it is a d. He added this sharp while proofreading FE2 (→EE); the accidental was also independently added by the reviser of GE, and this is the version we give in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes |
|||||||||
b. 65-67
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
It is uncertain whether the version of FE1 (→GE1→GE2) is authentic, since the Chopinesque proofreading of FE2 could have only added the marks overlooked by the engraver. If, however, FE1 reproduced the [A] notation correctly, the differences between the three source versions would mean that Chopin hesitated to the very end how long the f1 note should be sustained here. The EEW version probably resulted from an oversight by the tie to f1 by the engraver, while the GE3 version almost certainly stems from FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »