Issues : Arpeggio – vertical slur
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The absence of arpeggio sign in GE2 results presumably from an oversight by the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Arpeggio – vertical slur |
||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with analogous b. 31, the slur of GE, although formally correct, is most probably inaccurate and marks a grace note and an arpeggio (written down as a vertical slur), as was conveyed in FE. The absence of a slur (arpeggio) in EE, whatever the reason, cannot be authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE , Arpeggio – vertical slur |
||||||||
b. 107
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with analogous b. 31 and 57, the slur of GE, although formally correct, is most probably inaccurate and marks a grace note and an arpeggio (written down as a vertical slur). The missing slur (arpeggio) in FE (→EE) is most probably an oversight by the copyist in [FC] or by the engraver. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Arpeggio – vertical slur |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »