Issues : EE revisions
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
As was the case with b. 3, in A the long accent is placed right under the note; however, in FE it was moved to the right, hence it could be interpreted as a hairpin. This is how it was reproduced – moving it even further to the right – in EE2 (EE1 omitted the mark). The absence of the mark in GE is most probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In the final part of the roulade (starting from c2), there are no accidentals in A (→FC,FE). The patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE by adding the necessary sharps and a natural. See also notes to bars 32 and 36. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||||||
b. 19-20
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 21-23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor category imprint: issues: EE revisions |