![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
b. 1-14
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The The markings in the remaining sources also indicate that attempts were made to unify them, although in the case of FC (→GE), the first two passages are provided with clearly longer marks than the subsequent ones. Those versions can be considered an acceptable interpretation of the notation of A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Actually, the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||
b. 3-15
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The issue of interpreting the mark as a long accent – see b. 1-14. The missing mark in GE is most probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE |