Page:
Source:
p. 2, b. 30-59
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
b. 50
It is difficult to indicate which element of notation of FC could have misled the engraver of GE1. The absence of a respective correction in GE2 proves that the revision was implemented with the aim of detecting manifest errors; compliance with the Stichvorlage was not the main goal.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE
notation: Pitch
Missing markers on sources:
A, FC, EE1, EE2, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, FESch, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1a