Issues : Errors of FC
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
Fontana's mistake in the interpretation of the slurs of A could have been caused by a slur from the next page of A clearly showing through the paper – a fragment of a slur of the Prelude in C Minor seems to combine the two slurs of A in this place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
|||||||||||
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
The inconspicuous little slur of A was overlooked both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). The absence in CGS – see b. 1-9. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
|||||||||||
b. 5-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
The slur, encompassing the entire L.H. part in these bars, was reproduced incompletely in some sources, while GE reproduced it inaccurately:
A slur compliant with the notation of A is to be found in FE (→EE) only. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors of FC , Errors in CGS |
|||||||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
Like in the previous two bars, we assume the bottom arm of the hairpin in A to be reliable. The mark is absent in all the remaining sources, which is almost certainly a result of oversights:
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
The missing dashes marking the range of cresc. must be an oversight of Fontana in FC (→GE). In CGS the dashes reach only the middle of the bar, which is one of many minor inaccuracies of that copy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in CGS |