Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-48
p. 3, b. 49-71
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESch - Scherbatoff copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE1a - Corrected impression of EE1
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1a
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESch - Scherbatoff copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE1a - Corrected impression of EE1
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1a
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 7

on 6th quaver in A, probable reading

on 5th quaver in A (another reading→FC)

on 3. beat in A (possible reading→FEEE)

on 2nd beat in GE

[ ] suggested by the editors

 on 3rd beat, our alternative suggestion

The position of the second  marking in this bar in A (→FC) is questionable. It is placed under the 2nd and 3rd quavers of the middle triplet (due to the correction of the 2nd quaver, they are very close to each other); it can also be assigned to the 1st note of the 3rd triplet (the version of GE is almost certainly contrary to the idea of Chopin). According to us, in A it seems that the mark should be associated with f on the 6th quaver of the bar, whereas in FC with b on the 5th one. Along with the version of FE, it exhausts the possibilities of a direct interpretation of this notation.
We suggest two more solutions drawn from the unequivocal, authentic pedalling of similar phrases in b. 5 and 17.
A similar situation can be found in b. 39. 

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in A

notation: Pedalling

Missing markers on sources: A, FC, EE1, EE2, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, FESch, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1a