Page:
Source:
p. 1, b. 1-26
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
b. 3-4
As was the case with b. 1-2, we consider the top arm of the hairpin in A to be reliable. In all the remaining sources (except for CGS, in which the marks were overlooked), it was the range of the bottom arm that was taken into account. In the editions, both marks were extended or moved, most probably after their own, general editorial principles.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Scope of dynamic hairpins, GE revisions, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Missing markers on sources:
CGS, A, FC, EE1, EE2, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, FESch, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1a