Issues : Errors in FE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The change of time signature in FE probably resulted from the engraver's inattention. In Chopin's pieces, it was common that engravers did not differentiate between and , see the Prelude No. 14 in E Minor. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
||||||||
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The missing cresc. - - - in FE (→EE) is most probably a mistake of the engraver. It was the entire indication that was overlooked in b. 10-14. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 12-14
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The absence of fingering in FE (→EE) is probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of FE. The digit having been moved by one note in b. 22 is probably a mistake of the engraver of GE. That mistake was repeated in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the two L.H. slurs beginning in the 2nd half of b. 29 after A. None of the remaining sources reproduced them faultlessly. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors of FC |