mUltimate Chopin

Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 40-41

composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor

in A (→FE→EE)

No sign in FC (→GE)
..

The overlooked  mark in FC (→GE) is one of a few oversights of Fontana in the ending of the Prelude.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC

b. 42

composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor

Accent in A (→FE→EE)

No mark in FC (→GE)
..

It is the copyist's distraction in the ending of the piece that is responsible for the missing accent in FC (→GE) – see next note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC

b. 45

composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor

Staccato dot in A (→FC,FE)

No mark in GE

2 dots in EE
..

The missing staccato dot over the f4 quaver is an oversight of the engraver of GE, and the second one added over the L.H. quaver – a revision of EE (in such type of texture Chopin would often regard the articulation markings – dots, slurs – written over the R.H. part as applying to both parts).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE

b. 45

composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor

Staccato dot in A (→FE→EE)

No mark in FC (→GE)
..

The missing staccato dot over the last chord in the bar is an oversight of the copyist.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC