Issues : EE revisions
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The indication espressivo is written in the sources in the form of an abbreviation: espres. in A, espress. in FC (→GE), FE and CGS and esp. in EE. In the main text we explain the abbreviation, which was probably used due to lack of space in A to write an entire word. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Abbreviated indications |
||||||||||||
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The longer slur of As is probably the initial version, concerning the crossed-out version of the melodic line in b. 10-11. It is indicated by a second slur between b. 11-12, which begins only just over the a1 crotchet, added (or left) as valid after corrections. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The range of the hairpins in A is unclear, since the is written at the end of the line, practically already beyond the bar line. In spite of that, diminuendo must concern also b. 16, since at the beginning of b. 17 we can already see a new sign – . This is how it was interpreted both in FC (→GE) and FE (with a slight difference in the range), and this is the interpretation we give in the main text. The absence of the marks in EE1 is most probably a mistake of the engraver, rectified in EE2 on the basis of a comparison with GE1, which is indicated by the compliance of the range of the marks. The hairpins in CGS are most probably inaccurately outlined marks of FE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in EE , FE revisions , Fontana's revisions , Inaccuracies in A |